Communications & Media Transactions Strategic Counsel |
The proper resolution of an agency matter may require judicial action. Appeals of most federal agency decisions are heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The firm's attorneys have substantial experience litigating communications-related controversies before that court.
WMN also has a specialized practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. Litigation in that forum typically involves novel issues of constitutional or statutory law, reviewed by the Court in the context of often complex and evolving jurisprudence. For these reasons, a party before the Court is best served by counsel who have a sophisticated understanding of Supreme Court procedures and practices, who are conversant with the Court's precedents and who routinely assess patterns and trends in the Court's making of new law. WMB is qualified to handle the nuance and novelty of issues which come before the Court, and the analytical rigor of our work resonates with Justices who themselves are highly analytical in their approach to the law.
In addition to the preparation of petitions for certiorari, an important part of our practice is the representation of clients who wish to submit amicus curiae briefs that bring to the Court's attention relevant matter not already treated by the main parties. Unfortunately, many amicus briefs are of the 'me too sort', providing little assistance to the Court. By contrast, we work closely with our clients to fashion arguments that are genuine contributions to the Court's analysis. Often this is done as part of an orchestrated effort among all amici in a particular case. The brief may treat a legal point not addressed by a party or it may discuss a policy, doctrinal, historical or philosophical element that is crucial for an appropriate resolution of the case. Whatever orientation is chosen, our clients' interests are advanced in a framework of originality designed to garner the attention of the Court. |
